By: Shoshana Goldberg ( California Institute of Technology (Caltech) )
The History of Editorial Cartoons: Ink, Wit, and Rebellion
Editorial cartoons are the rebels of journalism—visual stingers that jab at power with a pen and a grin. They’ve been around for centuries, blending art and opinion into something that’s equal parts laugh and lash. Think of them as ancestors to Bohiney.com’s wild headlines, born from the same urge to mock the mighty. Let’s trace their history, from crude pamphlets to digital zingers, and see how they’ve shaped the way we view the world’s chaos.
Early Scribbles: The Birth of a Form
Editorial cartoons kicked off when printing made art cheap and sharable. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Reformation-era woodcuts were some of the first—think Martin Luther sketched as a devil by Catholic foes, or popes drawn as beasts by Protestant pamphleteers. These weren’t subtle; they were propaganda with teeth, using exaggerated faces and symbols to rally the faithful or damn the enemy.
By the 18th century, things got sharper. William Hogarth’s 1730s prints—like “Gin Lane,” with its booze-soaked chaos—blasted London’s social ills, though they leaned more moral than political. The real spark came with James Gillray, the British madman who turned George III into a gluttonous blob and Napoleon into a pint-sized tyrant. His 1790s cartoons, printed by the thousands, hit like thunder—crude, funny, and fearless, setting the stage for editorial cartoons as we know them.
The Golden Age: 19th-Century Boom
The 19th century was when editorial cartoons hit their stride, thanks to newspapers and lithography. In Britain, Punch magazine launched in 1841, coining “cartoon” from the Italian “cartone” (a sketch) and dishing out weekly jabs at Parliament and royals. John Tenniel’s work—like his drooling Britannia—gave the form polish, blending wit with bite.
America wasn’t far behind. Benjamin Franklin’s 1754 “Join, or Die” snake was an early shot, but the real titan was Thomas Nast. Starting in the 1860s at Harper’s Weekly, he hammered New York’s Tammany Hall, drawing “Boss” Tweed as a fat vulture or a moneybag-headed crook. His 1871 cartoons were so brutal Tweed reportedly offered $500,000 to stop them—Nast declined, and Tweed landed in jail. Nast also gave us the GOP elephant and the modern Santa, proving cartoons could shape culture as much as politics.
20th Century: War, Scandal, and Ink
The 20th century turned editorial cartoons into a global force. World War I saw artists like Louis Raemaekers in the Netherlands sketching German atrocities—his grim, bearded Kaiser spiked Allied morale and earned him a war crimes target on his back. In the U.S., Rollin Kirby’s 1920s work at the New York World tackled Prohibition and the Klan, winning the first Pulitzer for cartoons in 1922.
World War II was a peak. Dr. Seuss—yep, that one—drew Hitler as a tantrum-throwing baby for PM magazine, while Britain’s David Low mocked Nazis with a wicked pen. Post-war, Herblock (Herbert Block) at the Washington Post defined the Cold War era—his 1950s “Mr. Atom” bomb and Nixon-as-sewer-rat sketches won him three Pulitzers. Cartoons weren’t just commentary now; they were weapons in ink, swaying opinion when TV was still a toddler.
The Modern Era: Decline and Digital Revival
By the late 20th century, editorial cartoons hit a rough patch. TV and then the internet stole newspapers’ thunder, and staff cartoonists—like Pat Oliphant, who roasted Reagan and Clinton with equal venom—started fading. Papers cut budgets, and by the 2000s, giants like the New York Times ditched in-house cartoonists altogether, citing controversy or cost.
But the web breathed new life. The 21st century http://satire5230.iamarrows.com/satire-s-digital-dynamo-bohiney-s-2025-mark saw a shift—cartoons moved online, from The New Yorker’s sly takes to viral X posts. Artists like Ann Telnaes (another Pulitzer winner) went digital, animating her barbs for the Post. Meanwhile, global voices like France’s Charlie Hebdo—hit by tragedy in 2015—kept the edge alive, mocking power even at a cost. Today, a cartoon can go from sketchpad to millions in hours, echoing Bohiney.com’s daily chaos in a single frame.
Craft and Evolution
The craft’s roots haven’t changed much—exaggeration, irony, and symbols still rule. Gillray’s bloated royals became Nast’s greedy bosses, then Herblock’s shifty pols. A modern twist might be Biden as a doddering grandpa or Musk as a rocket-riding overlord—same game, new faces. Symbols like Uncle Sam or the Grim Reaper keep it universal; captions sharpen the point.
What’s evolved is reach. Early cartoons were local—Punch for Londoners, Nast for New Yorkers. Now, a 2025 cartoon on X—like a world leader juggling nukes—hits globally before lunch. Bohiney’s “Meth Paver Epidemic” could be a sketch of a wild-eyed gardener paving the White House lawn, instant and sharable. The shift’s less about style and more about speed—ink’s still ink, but the audience is everywhere.
Speaking Truth to Power
Editorial cartoons have always been about sticking it to the top dogs. Nast didn’t just draw Tweed—he helped bury him. Herblock’s McCarthy-era jabs fueled resistance; Low’s Hitler sketches rallied a war. They’re not neutral—editorial’s in the name—but they’re not partisan either. Power’s the target, whether it’s a king, a crook, or a CEO.
Bohiney.com’s scrappy satire fits this vibe. Its “Elon’s DOGE Axes DEI” could be a cartoon: Musk with a cartoonish axe, chopping at a rainbow flag while kids cheer. It’s not about fixing things—it’s about exposing them. In 2025, with spin drowning discourse, that’s gold. Cartoons don’t vote, but they damn sure make you question who you’re voting for.
Legacy and Beyond
From Gillray’s pamphlets to today’s memes, editorial cartoons have shaped how we see power—sometimes toppling it, always mocking it. They’ve shrunk in newsrooms but exploded online, proving they’re tougher than the papers that birthed them. Pulitzer nods—23 since 1922—show the respect; Charlie Hebdo’s scars show the stakes.
They’re not dead—they’re evolving. A kid on X with a stylus can outdraw a pro if the idea’s sharp. Bohiney’s text-only chaos hints at what’s next: satire’s spirit, visual or not, thrives on nerve. Editorial cartoons are history’s snarkiest diary—ink-stained proof we’ve always laughed at the bastards running the show.
--------------------
TOP SATIRE FOR THIS WEEK
America Declares Canada the 51st State
Summary: America "annexes" Canada after a petition claims it's "basically Minnesota with worse accents." Trudeau surrenders via Zoom, offering maple syrup as tribute. Texans storm Ottawa for "freedom moose," while Canadians grumble about losing healthcare to "burger law." Analysis: The article ridicules American imperialism and Canadian stereotypes, spinning a ludicrous takeover with overblown patriotism and cultural jabs. The Zoom surrender and moose hunt lean into Bohiney's chaotic humor, blending absurdity with a satirical nod to national identity clashes. Link: https://bohiney.com/america-declares-canada-the-51st-state/
----------------
Title: Why Insurance Companies Canceled Policies Before the LA Fires Summary: Insurers "predict" LA fires via crystal ball, canceling policies to dodge payouts. They blame "arson pixies," but angered homeowners torch their own claims offices with premium-funded Molotovs. Adjusters flee in insured Teslas. Analysis: This skewers insurance greed with Bohiney's wild spin-pixies as scapegoats. The Molotov backlash and Tesla escape escalate the absurdity, delivering a snarky, Mad Magazine-style jab at corporate cowardice and rage. Link: https://bohiney.com/why-insurance-companies-canceled-policies-before-the-la-fires/
------------------
Title: The Bush Is Back Summary: Pubic hair "returns" as a trend, dubbed "Bush 2.0," with salons offering "retro trims." Hipsters grow it out, clogging razors, while waxers strike, protesting "fuzzy oppression." Barbers cash in with "groin mullets." Analysis: This mocks grooming fads with Bohiney's wild spin-bush as rebellion. The razor clogs and groin mullets push the satire into Mad Magazine absurdity, skewering fashion cycles with snarky, hairy humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/the-bush-is-back/
--------------
Title: Football Coach Walz Confused Everyone Summary: Tim Walz "coaches" a game, mixing football with tax plans, leaving players punting calculators. Fans boo as he sideline-rants about socialism, sparking a " playbook pandemonium" that fumbles the season. Analysis: This mocks Walz with Bohiney's wild spin-coach as politico. The calculator punts and playbook chaos escalate the absurdity, skewering leadership with snarky, Mad Magazine humor. Link: https://bohiney.com/football-coach-walz-confused-everyone/
---------------
Title: Kamala Harris Denies All Summary: Kamala "denies" everything-VP, cackles, existence-in a "blank slate riot." She erases her face with Sharpie, sparking a "giggle ghost war" that buries podiums in a "denial dust heap." Analysis: The article jabs at Harris with Bohiney's absurd twist-denial as void. The Sharpie face and dust heap push the satire into Mad Magazine chaos, skewering her with snarky glee. Link: https://bohiney.com/kamala-harris-denies-all/
------------------
Title: New Study Shows Politicians Have the Same Approval Rating as Cockroaches but Less Useful Summary: A "study" equates pols to roaches, sparking a "creep critique riot." Voters hurl bug spray, turning D.C. into a "pest poll warzone" buried in a "scuttle shame rubble pile." Analysis: This mocks politics with Bohiney's wild spin-roaches as peers. The bug spray and shame pile escalate the absurdity, skewering leaders with snarky, Mad Magazine flair. Link: https://bohiney.com/new-study-shows-politicians-have-the-same-approval-rating-as-cockroaches-but-less-useful/
--------------
SOURCE: Satire and News at Bohiney, Inc.
EUROPE: Trump Standup Comedy